Aria Compute Unit vs BNB
Aria Compute Unit (ACU) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.12 across 251 shared trading days). ACU has been the more volatile of the two, at 203% annualised against BNB's 51%.
Performance
| Period | ACU | BNB | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | +4.31% | +0.82% | ACU |
| 30 days | +2.17% | +12.64% | BNB |
| 90 days | +57.19% | +39.21% | ACU |
| 1 year | — | -19.57% | — |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | ACU | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -76.3% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.50 | 1.13 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: ACU outperformed BNB by 19.6% — measured on the ACU/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.12over 251 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0590d: 0.111y: insufficient data
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.