axttt vs XRP
axttt (AT) and XRP (XRP) compared side by side. Over the past 1 year, XRP is ahead by 16.8 percentage points (AT -65.1% against XRP -48.2%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.13 across 341 shared trading days). AT has been the more volatile of the two, at 133% annualised against XRP's 66%.
Performance
| Period | AT | XRP | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -10.26% | -5.22% | XRP |
| 30 days | +13.03% | +9.80% | AT |
| 90 days | +4.94% | +41.56% | XRP |
| 1 year | -65.09% | -48.24% | XRP |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | AT | XRP |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -82.5% | -68.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.07 | 0.60 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +41.9% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -47.3% |
Relative strength over 90 days: XRP outperformed AT by 25.9% — measured on the AT/XRP ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.13over 341 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2090d: 0.181y: 0.13
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.