BFC vs XRP
BFC (BFC) and XRP (XRP) compared side by side. Over the past 1 year, BFC is ahead by 22.3 percentage points (BFC -23.6% against XRP -45.9%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.05 across 399 shared trading days). BFC has been the more volatile of the two, at 229% annualised against XRP's 66%.
Performance
| Period | BFC | XRP | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -5.90% | +7.53% | XRP |
| 30 days | +164.00% | +9.60% | BFC |
| 90 days | +140.64% | +43.22% | BFC |
| 1 year | -23.63% | -45.92% | BFC |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | BFC | XRP |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -79.8% | -68.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.30 | 0.62 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | +288.7% | +41.9% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | -37.5% | -47.3% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BFC outperformed XRP by 74.0% — measured on the BFC/XRP ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.05over 399 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.2190d: -0.101y: 0.05
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.