Big N’ Bouncy vs BNB
Big N’ Bouncy (BNB) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Over the past 1 year, BNB is ahead by 3.8 percentage points (BNB -23.4% against BNB -19.6%). Their daily returns move very closely together (correlation 1.00 across 399 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 51% annualised.
Performance
| Period | BNB | BNB | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -4.85% | +0.82% | BNB |
| 30 days | +9.82% | +12.64% | BNB |
| 90 days | +39.17% | +39.21% | BNB |
| 1 year | -23.40% | -19.57% | BNB |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | BNB | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -58.2% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 1.13 | 1.13 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | +29.4% | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | -34.9% | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed BNB by 0.0% — measured on the BNB/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
1.00over 399 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 1.0090d: 1.001y: 1.00
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.