Blender Exchange vs BNB
Blender Exchange (BLEND) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.29 across 100 shared trading days). BLEND has been the more volatile of the two, at 72% annualised against BNB's 51%.
Performance
| Period | BLEND | BNB | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -3.42% | -4.43% | BLEND |
| 30 days | -0.53% | +10.31% | BNB |
| 90 days | +5.20% | +39.79% | BNB |
| 1 year | — | -23.07% | — |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | BLEND | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -19.8% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.08 | 1.15 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed BLEND by 24.7% — measured on the BLEND/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.29over 100 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3590d: 0.341y: insufficient data
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.