BNB (BNB) is 7247.5× the size of Boundless (ZKC) by market capitalisation. Over the past 1 year, BNB is ahead by 71.9 percentage points (ZKC -94.4% against BNB -22.6%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.37 across 370 shared trading days). ZKC has been the more volatile of the two, at 129% annualised against BNB's 52%.
| Period | ZKC | BNB | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -12.98% | +4.73% | BNB |
| 30 days | +2.00% | +16.37% | BNB |
| 90 days | -16.02% | +30.43% | BNB |
| 1 year | -94.44% | -22.57% | BNB |
| Metric | ZKC | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -96.1% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.13 | 0.88 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | +62.4% | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | -73.8% | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed ZKC by 35.6% — measured on the ZKC/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.