CASHCAT vs BNB
CASHCAT (CASHCAT) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.40 across 34 shared trading days). CASHCAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 223% annualised against BNB's 51%.
Performance
| Period | CASHCAT | BNB | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | +3.16% | +0.82% | CASHCAT |
| 30 days | -8.56% | +12.64% | BNB |
| 90 days | — | +39.21% | — |
| 1 year | — | -19.57% | — |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | CASHCAT | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -47.5% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.01 | 1.13 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed CASHCAT by 15.7% — measured on the CASHCAT/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.40over 34 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.