BNB (BNB) is 947.1× the size of Chutes (SN64) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.43 across 31 shared trading days). SN64 has been the more volatile of the two, at 97% annualised against BNB's 52%.
| Period | SN64 | BNB | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -8.57% | +4.73% | BNB |
| 30 days | +0.52% | +16.37% | BNB |
| 90 days | — | +30.43% | — |
| 1 year | — | -22.57% | — |
| Metric | SN64 | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -23.4% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.01 | 0.88 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed SN64 by 17.8% — measured on the SN64/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.