CumRocket vs Ethereum
CumRocket (CUMMIES) and Ethereum (ETH) compared side by side. Over the past 1 year, ETH is ahead by 7.7 percentage points (CUMMIES -40.8% against ETH -33.1%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.51 across 399 shared trading days). CUMMIES has been the more volatile of the two, at 86% annualised against ETH's 63%.
Performance
| Period | CUMMIES | ETH | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -12.07% | +1.64% | ETH |
| 30 days | +42.95% | +10.06% | CUMMIES |
| 90 days | +32.58% | +66.68% | ETH |
| 1 year | -40.78% | -33.09% | ETH |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | CUMMIES | ETH |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -70.0% | -66.7% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | +65.0% | +34.1% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | -47.4% | -44.6% |
Relative strength over 90 days: ETH outperformed CUMMIES by 18.1% — measured on the CUMMIES/ETH ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.51over 399 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5890d: 0.261y: 0.50
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.