BNB (BNB) is 4.3× the size of Figure Heloc (FIGR_HELOC) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.02 across 29 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 53% annualised.
| Period | FIGR_HELOC | BNB | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.63% | +4.73% | BNB |
| 30 days | +2.19% | +16.37% | BNB |
| 90 days | — | +30.43% | — |
| 1 year | — | -22.57% | — |
| Metric | FIGR_HELOC | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -5.2% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.04 | 0.88 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed FIGR_HELOC by 13.1% — measured on the FIGR_HELOC/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.