LEO Token vs Hedera
LEO Token (LEO) is 1.9× the size of Hedera (HBAR) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.09 across 31 shared trading days). HBAR has been the more volatile of the two, at 68% annualised against LEO's 22%.
Performance
| Period | LEO | HBAR | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.60% | +33.36% | HBAR |
| 30 days | -3.75% | +24.17% | HBAR |
| 90 days | — | +31.00% | — |
| 1 year | — | -55.40% | — |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | LEO | HBAR |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -7.0% | -74.8% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.17 | 0.59 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +24.2% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -39.4% |
Relative strength over 90 days: HBAR outperformed LEO by 16.3% — measured on the LEO/HBAR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
-0.09over 31 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.