LUNA CLASSIC vs XRP
LUNA CLASSIC (LUNC) and XRP (XRP) compared side by side. Over the past 1 year, LUNC is ahead by 42.8 percentage points (LUNC -3.2% against XRP -45.9%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.36 across 399 shared trading days). LUNC has been the more volatile of the two, at 125% annualised against XRP's 66%.
Performance
| Period | LUNC | XRP | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -4.38% | +7.53% | XRP |
| 30 days | +0.87% | +9.60% | XRP |
| 90 days | -10.80% | +43.22% | XRP |
| 1 year | -3.16% | -45.92% | LUNC |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | LUNC | XRP |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -58.9% | -68.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.18 | 0.62 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | +214.7% | +41.9% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | -42.7% | -47.3% |
Relative strength over 90 days: XRP outperformed LUNC by 36.1% — measured on the LUNC/XRP ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.36over 399 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.7090d: 0.741y: 0.35
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.