Stellar vs Hedera
Stellar (XLM) is 1.7× the size of Hedera (HBAR) by market capitalisation. Over the past 1 year, XLM is ahead by 14.1 percentage points (XLM -41.3% against HBAR -55.4%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.77 across 399 shared trading days). XLM has been the more volatile of the two, at 78% annualised against HBAR's 68%.
Performance
| Period | XLM | HBAR | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | +22.77% | +33.36% | HBAR |
| 30 days | +8.26% | +24.17% | HBAR |
| 90 days | +16.55% | +31.00% | HBAR |
| 1 year | -41.30% | -55.40% | XLM |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | XLM | HBAR |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -66.2% | -74.8% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.26 | 0.59 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | +63.3% | +24.2% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | -39.7% | -39.4% |
Relative strength over 90 days: HBAR outperformed XLM by 11.0% — measured on the XLM/HBAR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.77over 399 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.7790d: 0.691y: 0.76
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.