Vetted vs XRP
Vetted (VET) and XRP (XRP) compared side by side. Over the past 1 year, XRP is ahead by 14.9 percentage points (VET -60.8% against XRP -45.9%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.77 across 399 shared trading days). VET has been the more volatile of the two, at 78% annualised against XRP's 66%.
Performance
| Period | VET | XRP | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -6.94% | +7.53% | XRP |
| 30 days | +22.36% | +9.60% | VET |
| 90 days | +99.40% | +43.22% | VET |
| 1 year | -60.80% | -45.92% | XRP |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | VET | XRP |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -83.2% | -68.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 1.25 | 0.62 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | +71.4% | +41.9% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | -43.4% | -47.3% |
Relative strength over 90 days: VET outperformed XRP by 43.2% — measured on the VET/XRP ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.77over 399 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5790d: 0.591y: 0.77
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.