BTC$78,379.92▲ 1.39%ETH$2,319.63▲ 1.49%USDT$0.9989▲ 0.03%BNB$701.10▲ 0.64%XRP$1.28▼ 0.11%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.01▼ 0.41%TRX$0.3189▼ 1.06%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.07%ZEC$1,279.48▲ 7.13%HYPE$84.64▼ 1.89%XMR$118.70▲ 2.22%DOGE$0.0749▼ 0.31%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$75.13▲ 1.20%LEO$9.33▲ 0.48%LINK$11.13▼ 0.74%ADA$0.1896▼ 0.61%XLM$0.1625▼ 1.99%BCH$273.20▼ 1.34%NEAR$3.99▲ 2.36%USDE$1.00▲ 0.01%DAI$0.9999▼ 0.02%UNI$7.30▼ 0.88%RAIN$0.006027▼ 5.90%LTC$54.71▲ 0.26%CC$0.0971▲ 1.13%AVAX$8.67▲ 0.71%USD1$0.9998▲ 0.09%SUI$0.9035▲ 1.26%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.78%XAUT$4,030.72▲ 2.21%HBAR$0.0703▲ 0.07%QNT$200.00▲ 1.89%USDG$0.9999▲ 0.00%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.48%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.00%TAO$228.50▲ 0.43%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0507▲ 0.08%BTC$78,379.92▲ 1.39%ETH$2,319.63▲ 1.49%USDT$0.9989▲ 0.03%BNB$701.10▲ 0.64%XRP$1.28▼ 0.11%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.01▼ 0.41%TRX$0.3189▼ 1.06%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.07%ZEC$1,279.48▲ 7.13%HYPE$84.64▼ 1.89%XMR$118.70▲ 2.22%DOGE$0.0749▼ 0.31%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$75.13▲ 1.20%LEO$9.33▲ 0.48%LINK$11.13▼ 0.74%ADA$0.1896▼ 0.61%XLM$0.1625▼ 1.99%BCH$273.20▼ 1.34%NEAR$3.99▲ 2.36%USDE$1.00▲ 0.01%DAI$0.9999▼ 0.02%UNI$7.30▼ 0.88%RAIN$0.006027▼ 5.90%LTC$54.71▲ 0.26%CC$0.0971▲ 1.13%AVAX$8.67▲ 0.71%USD1$0.9998▲ 0.09%SUI$0.9035▲ 1.26%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.78%XAUT$4,030.72▲ 2.21%HBAR$0.0703▲ 0.07%QNT$200.00▲ 1.89%USDG$0.9999▲ 0.00%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.48%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.00%TAO$228.50▲ 0.43%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0507▲ 0.08%

360noscope420blazeit vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 260.5× the size of 360noscope420blazeit (MLG) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.54 across 31 shared trading days). MLG has been the more volatile of the two, at 126% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.54
Size ratio
1 : 260.5
360noscope420blazeitMLG

$0.000666

24h
+0.61%
Market cap
$664,034
Volume 24h
$1,029
Volatility (ann.)
126%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.173800

24h
+0.29%
Market cap
$173.00M
Volume 24h
$24.50M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
MLG 0.4%Share of the two combined market caps99.6% WIF

Performance

MLGWIF

  1. 7 days+7.26%-4.50%MLG
  2. 30 days+2.14%-32.23%MLG
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.54over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricMLGWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-27.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.020.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed MLG by 19.1% — measured on the MLG/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.