BTC$80,502.57▲ 2.84%ETH$2,419.94▲ 4.31%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.06%BNB$715.17▲ 1.86%XRP$1.32▲ 3.42%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.56▲ 3.76%TRX$0.3185▼ 1.12%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.51%ZEC$1,318.59▲ 2.63%HYPE$83.78▼ 2.73%DOGE$0.0770▲ 2.32%XMR$118.70▼ 0.77%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.83▲ 3.23%LINK$11.63▲ 3.86%LEO$9.35▲ 0.42%ADA$0.1992▲ 3.78%XLM$0.1675▲ 2.13%BCH$289.60▲ 4.32%NEAR$4.03▼ 0.56%UNI$7.64▲ 2.07%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.25▲ 2.84%RAIN$0.006110▼ 1.89%CC$0.1028▲ 3.39%AVAX$8.78▲ 1.26%SUI$0.9298▲ 1.52%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.00%GRAM$1.17▼ 1.14%XAUT$4,107.73▲ 2.10%HBAR$0.0732▲ 3.45%QNT$205.50▲ 5.95%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.37%TAO$236.50▲ 2.19%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0524▲ 2.28%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,502.57▲ 2.84%ETH$2,419.94▲ 4.31%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.06%BNB$715.17▲ 1.86%XRP$1.32▲ 3.42%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.56▲ 3.76%TRX$0.3185▼ 1.12%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.51%ZEC$1,318.59▲ 2.63%HYPE$83.78▼ 2.73%DOGE$0.0770▲ 2.32%XMR$118.70▼ 0.77%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.83▲ 3.23%LINK$11.63▲ 3.86%LEO$9.35▲ 0.42%ADA$0.1992▲ 3.78%XLM$0.1675▲ 2.13%BCH$289.60▲ 4.32%NEAR$4.03▼ 0.56%UNI$7.64▲ 2.07%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.25▲ 2.84%RAIN$0.006110▼ 1.89%CC$0.1028▲ 3.39%AVAX$8.78▲ 1.26%SUI$0.9298▲ 1.52%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.00%GRAM$1.17▼ 1.14%XAUT$4,107.73▲ 2.10%HBAR$0.0732▲ 3.45%QNT$205.50▲ 5.95%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.37%TAO$236.50▲ 2.19%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0524▲ 2.28%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

888 vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 873.5× the size of 888 (888) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.23 across 35 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against 888's 53%.

Correlation
0.23
Size ratio
1 : 873.5
888888

$0.002232

24h
+3.93%
Market cap
$198,288
Volume 24h
$2
Volatility (ann.)
53%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.173500

24h
-2.62%
Market cap
$173.20M
Volume 24h
$29.50M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
888 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% WIF

Performance

888WIF

  1. 7 days-6.12%-7.39%888
  2. 30 days-24.44%-32.13%888
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.23over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2190d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric888WIF
Max drawdown (400d)-27.4%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.370.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: 888 outperformed WIF by 17.7% — measured on the 888/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.