BTC$80,514.00▲ 3.38%ETH$2,429.59▲ 5.71%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$720.15▲ 2.69%XRP$1.31▲ 2.24%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.34▲ 1.68%TRX$0.3202▼ 0.92%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.14%ZEC$1,305.68▲ 6.28%HYPE$83.79▼ 2.36%DOGE$0.0772▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 1.68%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.06%LINK$11.51▲ 3.17%LEO$9.35▲ 0.83%ADA$0.1980▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1679▲ 2.49%BCH$283.60▲ 2.82%NEAR$4.06▲ 4.63%UNI$7.71▲ 7.36%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$56.42▲ 2.95%RAIN$0.005961▼ 7.78%CC$0.0985▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.77▲ 2.76%SUI$0.9300▲ 2.98%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.20▲ 1.24%XAUT$4,050.47▲ 3.11%HBAR$0.0728▲ 3.96%QNT$203.52▲ 4.84%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.55%TAO$235.90▲ 3.50%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0518▲ 2.54%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,514.00▲ 3.38%ETH$2,429.59▲ 5.71%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$720.15▲ 2.69%XRP$1.31▲ 2.24%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.34▲ 1.68%TRX$0.3202▼ 0.92%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.14%ZEC$1,305.68▲ 6.28%HYPE$83.79▼ 2.36%DOGE$0.0772▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 1.68%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.06%LINK$11.51▲ 3.17%LEO$9.35▲ 0.83%ADA$0.1980▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1679▲ 2.49%BCH$283.60▲ 2.82%NEAR$4.06▲ 4.63%UNI$7.71▲ 7.36%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$56.42▲ 2.95%RAIN$0.005961▼ 7.78%CC$0.0985▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.77▲ 2.76%SUI$0.9300▲ 2.98%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.20▲ 1.24%XAUT$4,050.47▲ 3.11%HBAR$0.0728▲ 3.96%QNT$203.52▲ 4.84%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.55%TAO$235.90▲ 3.50%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0518▲ 2.54%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Abelian vs Injective

Injective (INJ) is 47.0× the size of Abelian (ABEL) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.32 across 31 shared trading days). INJ has been the more volatile of the two, at 100% annualised against ABEL's 75%.

Correlation
0.32
Size ratio
1 : 47.0
AbelianABEL

$0.117261

24h
+0.89%
Market cap
$16.97M
Volume 24h
$14,511
Volatility (ann.)
75%
InjectiveINJ

$8.0130

24h
+9.94%
Market cap
$796.91M
Volume 24h
$91.26M
Volatility (ann.)
100%
ABEL 2.1%Share of the two combined market caps97.9% INJ

Performance

ABELINJ

  1. 7 days-9.28%-9.01%INJ
  2. 30 days+5.03%-5.17%ABEL
  3. 90 days—+49.14%—
  4. 1 year—+7.54%—

Correlation

0.32over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricABELINJ
Max drawdown (400d)-15.2%-79.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.070.46
Best 30 days (past year)—+92.8%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-46.8%

Relative strength over 90 days: INJ outperformed ABEL by 26.8% — measured on the ABEL/INJ ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.