AINL vs Unibase

Unibase (UB) is 49537.5× the size of AINL (AINL) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, UB is ahead by 3.8 percentage points (AINL -20.6% against UB -16.8%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.44 across 21 shared trading days). AINL has been the more volatile of the two, at 136% annualised against UB's 101%.

Correlation: 0.44
Size ratio: 1 : 49537.5
Ahead over 30 days: UB

AINLAINL

$5.400e-6

24h: -0.73%
Market cap: $5,318
Volume 24h: $7
Volatility (ann.): 136%

UnibaseUB

$0.105409

24h: -2.77%
Market cap: $263.42M
Volume 24h: $10.73M
Volatility (ann.): 101%

AINL 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% UB

Performance

AINLUB

7 days-7.69%-7.80%AINL
30 days-20.63%-16.85%UB

Correlation

0.44over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	AINL	UB
Max drawdown (400d)	-34.9%	-31.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.15	-0.05

Relative strength over 90 days: UB outperformed AINL by 4.4% — measured on the AINL/UB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

AINL →Unibase →