AKAS vs BNB

AKAS (AS) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.11 across 34 shared trading days). BNB has been the more volatile of the two, at 51% annualised against AS's 13%.

Correlation: 0.11

AKASAS

$0.158037

24h: -1.43%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $64,251
Volatility (ann.): 13%

BNBBNB

$718.0000

24h: +3.14%
Market cap: $94.47B
Volume 24h: $1.12B
Volatility (ann.): 51%

AS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB

Performance

ASBNB

7 days-7.88%-6.28%BNB
30 days-33.63%-12.23%BNB
90 days—+17.56%—
1 year—-29.73%—

Correlation

0.11over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	AS	BNB
Max drawdown (400d)	-36.4%	-58.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-2.84	0.45
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+29.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-34.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed AS by 29.6% — measured on the AS/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

AKAS →BNB →