BTC$78,348.99▲ 0.96%ETH$2,318.36▲ 1.06%USDT$0.9991▲ 0.04%BNB$700.26▲ 0.08%XRP$1.28▼ 0.30%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$92.90▼ 0.50%TRX$0.3193▼ 1.09%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.24%ZEC$1,287.26▲ 6.64%HYPE$84.38▼ 1.20%XMR$118.70▲ 2.93%DOGE$0.0748▼ 0.57%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.22▲ 0.78%LEO$9.33▲ 0.62%LINK$11.15▼ 1.21%ADA$0.1898▼ 0.77%XLM$0.1628▼ 2.07%BCH$273.60▼ 1.04%NEAR$4.01▲ 2.74%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%UNI$7.31▼ 0.90%RAIN$0.006021▼ 5.71%LTC$54.66▼ 0.35%CC$0.0975▲ 0.89%AVAX$8.68▲ 0.84%USD1$0.9998▲ 0.10%SUI$0.9031▲ 0.75%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.23%XAUT$4,029.16▲ 1.85%HBAR$0.0704▲ 0.24%QNT$199.16▼ 0.19%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.44%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.00%TAO$228.90▲ 0.48%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%CRO$0.0507▼ 0.32%BTC$78,348.99▲ 0.96%ETH$2,318.36▲ 1.06%USDT$0.9991▲ 0.04%BNB$700.26▲ 0.08%XRP$1.28▼ 0.30%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$92.90▼ 0.50%TRX$0.3193▼ 1.09%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.24%ZEC$1,287.26▲ 6.64%HYPE$84.38▼ 1.20%XMR$118.70▲ 2.93%DOGE$0.0748▼ 0.57%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.22▲ 0.78%LEO$9.33▲ 0.62%LINK$11.15▼ 1.21%ADA$0.1898▼ 0.77%XLM$0.1628▼ 2.07%BCH$273.60▼ 1.04%NEAR$4.01▲ 2.74%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%UNI$7.31▼ 0.90%RAIN$0.006021▼ 5.71%LTC$54.66▼ 0.35%CC$0.0975▲ 0.89%AVAX$8.68▲ 0.84%USD1$0.9998▲ 0.10%SUI$0.9031▲ 0.75%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.23%XAUT$4,029.16▲ 1.85%HBAR$0.0704▲ 0.24%QNT$199.16▼ 0.19%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.44%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.00%TAO$228.90▲ 0.48%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%CRO$0.0507▼ 0.32%

AMATERASU OMIKAMI vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 38.2× the size of AMATERASU OMIKAMI (OMIKAMI) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.15 across 40 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against OMIKAMI's 84%.

Correlation
-0.15
Size ratio
1 : 38.2
AMATERASU OMIKAMIOMIKAMI

$0.004533

24h
-0.35%
Market cap
$4.53M
Volume 24h
$3,023
Volatility (ann.)
84%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.173000

24h
+0.44%
Market cap
$172.91M
Volume 24h
$24.70M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
OMIKAMI 2.6%Share of the two combined market caps97.4% WIF

Performance

OMIKAMIWIF

  1. 7 days+2.82%-4.50%OMIKAMI
  2. 30 days+8.68%-32.23%OMIKAMI
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

-0.15over 40 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.2290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricOMIKAMIWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-23.9%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.000.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: OMIKAMI outperformed WIF by 10.2% — measured on the OMIKAMI/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.