BTC$79,808.01▲ 1.74%ETH$2,390.98▲ 3.10%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$711.97▲ 1.59%XRP$1.31▲ 1.98%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.45▲ 2.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.29%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,315.38▲ 1.92%HYPE$81.67▼ 3.27%XMR$118.70▼ 0.73%DOGE$0.0760▲ 1.56%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$76.97▲ 2.27%LINK$11.43▲ 2.46%LEO$9.35▲ 0.27%ADA$0.1943▲ 2.54%XLM$0.1641▲ 0.88%BCH$289.30▲ 5.13%NEAR$3.95▼ 1.92%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.01%UNI$7.31▼ 0.28%LTC$55.13▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.005875▼ 2.47%CC$0.1002▲ 2.71%AVAX$8.68▼ 0.06%SUI$0.9122▲ 0.92%USD1$0.9994▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,110.00▲ 1.86%GRAM$1.15▼ 2.31%HBAR$0.0714▲ 1.55%QNT$202.18▲ 1.53%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.78%TAO$231.90▲ 1.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0515▲ 1.41%BTC$79,808.01▲ 1.74%ETH$2,390.98▲ 3.10%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$711.97▲ 1.59%XRP$1.31▲ 1.98%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.45▲ 2.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.29%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,315.38▲ 1.92%HYPE$81.67▼ 3.27%XMR$118.70▼ 0.73%DOGE$0.0760▲ 1.56%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$76.97▲ 2.27%LINK$11.43▲ 2.46%LEO$9.35▲ 0.27%ADA$0.1943▲ 2.54%XLM$0.1641▲ 0.88%BCH$289.30▲ 5.13%NEAR$3.95▼ 1.92%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.01%UNI$7.31▼ 0.28%LTC$55.13▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.005875▼ 2.47%CC$0.1002▲ 2.71%AVAX$8.68▼ 0.06%SUI$0.9122▲ 0.92%USD1$0.9994▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,110.00▲ 1.86%GRAM$1.15▼ 2.31%HBAR$0.0714▲ 1.55%QNT$202.18▲ 1.53%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.78%TAO$231.90▲ 1.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0515▲ 1.41%

ansem.tips vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 37968.0× the size of ansem.tips (TIPANSEM) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.09 across 35 shared trading days). TIPANSEM has been the more volatile of the two, at 348% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
-0.09
Size ratio
1 : 37968.0
ansem.tipsTIPANSEM

$4.590e-6

24h
+0.70%
Market cap
$4,527
Volume 24h
$58
Volatility (ann.)
348%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.171900

24h
-1.24%
Market cap
$171.89M
Volume 24h
$28.95M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
TIPANSEM 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

TIPANSEMWIF

  1. 7 days-75.40%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-93.49%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.09over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricTIPANSEMWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-95.6%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.270.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed TIPANSEM by 93.4% — measured on the TIPANSEM/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.