BTC$80,718.10▲ 4.08%ETH$2,438.13▲ 6.57%USDT$0.9991▲ 0.04%BNB$716.27▲ 2.48%XRP$1.32▲ 3.79%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$96.86▲ 3.72%TRX$0.3202▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.83%ZEC$1,322.09▲ 10.68%HYPE$86.13▲ 0.01%DOGE$0.0775▲ 3.15%XMR$118.70▲ 2.78%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$77.87▲ 4.74%LINK$11.66▲ 5.16%LEO$9.32▲ 0.46%ADA$0.1984▲ 4.65%XLM$0.1691▲ 3.22%BCH$281.10▲ 1.86%NEAR$4.18▲ 9.01%UNI$7.60▲ 4.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.05%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%LTC$56.36▲ 4.49%RAIN$0.005876▼ 6.69%AVAX$8.96▲ 5.35%CC$0.0999▲ 4.28%SUI$0.9419▲ 5.26%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.20▲ 2.35%XAUT$4,024.35▲ 2.59%HBAR$0.0730▲ 4.75%QNT$204.95▲ 5.39%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.55%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%TAO$236.90▲ 4.72%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.01%CRO$0.0522▲ 2.81%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.02%BTC$80,718.10▲ 4.08%ETH$2,438.13▲ 6.57%USDT$0.9991▲ 0.04%BNB$716.27▲ 2.48%XRP$1.32▲ 3.79%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$96.86▲ 3.72%TRX$0.3202▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.83%ZEC$1,322.09▲ 10.68%HYPE$86.13▲ 0.01%DOGE$0.0775▲ 3.15%XMR$118.70▲ 2.78%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$77.87▲ 4.74%LINK$11.66▲ 5.16%LEO$9.32▲ 0.46%ADA$0.1984▲ 4.65%XLM$0.1691▲ 3.22%BCH$281.10▲ 1.86%NEAR$4.18▲ 9.01%UNI$7.60▲ 4.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.05%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%LTC$56.36▲ 4.49%RAIN$0.005876▼ 6.69%AVAX$8.96▲ 5.35%CC$0.0999▲ 4.28%SUI$0.9419▲ 5.26%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.20▲ 2.35%XAUT$4,024.35▲ 2.59%HBAR$0.0730▲ 4.75%QNT$204.95▲ 5.39%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.55%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%TAO$236.90▲ 4.72%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.01%CRO$0.0522▲ 2.81%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.02%

apeonfone vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 99.3× the size of apeonfone (FONE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.35 across 36 shared trading days). FONE has been the more volatile of the two, at 479% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.35
Size ratio
1 : 99.3
apeonfoneFONE

$0.001826

24h
+5.04%
Market cap
$1.81M
Volume 24h
$1.30M
Volatility (ann.)
479%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.179900

24h
+3.78%
Market cap
$179.50M
Volume 24h
$26.93M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
FONE 1.0%Share of the two combined market caps99.0% WIF

Performance

FONEWIF

  1. 7 days-0.51%-4.50%FONE
  2. 30 days-68.39%-32.23%WIF
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.35over 36 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricFONEWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-89.5%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.180.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed FONE by 83.7% — measured on the FONE/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.