Artificial Super Inu vs GREEN MORNING

Artificial Super Inu (ASI) and GREEN MORNING (GM) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, ASI is ahead by 88.7 percentage points (ASI -11.1% against GM -99.8%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.36 across 30 shared trading days). GM has been the more volatile of the two, at 554548% annualised against ASI's 100%.

Correlation: 0.36
Ahead over 30 days: ASI

Artificial Super InuASI

$8.688e-6

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $3
Volatility (ann.): 100%

GREEN MORNINGGM

$0.003109

24h: +14.73%
Market cap: $3.11M
Volume 24h: $1.87M
Volatility (ann.): 554548%

ASI 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% GM

Performance

ASIGM

7 days-20.12%-99.29%ASI
30 days-11.09%-99.81%ASI

Correlation

0.36over 30 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	ASI	GM
Max drawdown (400d)	-40.0%	-100.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.11	0.00

Relative strength over 90 days: GM outperformed ASI by 16.9% — measured on the ASI/GM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Artificial Super Inu →GREEN MORNING →