ASH (ASH) and Ethereum Name Service (ENS) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.12 across 31 shared trading days). ASH has been the more volatile of the two, at 159% annualised against ENS's 82%.
ASHENS
0.12over 31 shared trading days
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
| Metric | ASH | ENS |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -45.0% | -82.4% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.07 | 0.17 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +48.0% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -51.6% |
Relative strength over 90 days: ENS outperformed ASH by 25.6% — measured on the ASH/ENS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.