BTC$80,538.01▲ 3.38%ETH$2,430.78▲ 5.71%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$720.00▲ 2.69%XRP$1.31▲ 2.24%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.31▲ 1.68%TRX$0.3201▼ 0.92%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.14%ZEC$1,301.72▲ 6.28%HYPE$83.65▼ 2.36%DOGE$0.0772▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 1.68%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.06%LINK$11.51▲ 3.17%LEO$9.35▲ 0.83%ADA$0.1980▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1679▲ 2.49%BCH$283.50▲ 2.82%NEAR$4.05▲ 4.63%UNI$7.72▲ 7.36%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$56.36▲ 2.95%RAIN$0.005961▼ 7.78%CC$0.0985▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.75▲ 2.76%SUI$0.9305▲ 2.98%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.19▲ 1.24%XAUT$4,049.01▲ 3.11%HBAR$0.0727▲ 3.96%QNT$203.62▲ 4.84%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.55%TAO$235.70▲ 3.50%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0518▲ 2.54%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,538.01▲ 3.38%ETH$2,430.78▲ 5.71%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$720.00▲ 2.69%XRP$1.31▲ 2.24%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.31▲ 1.68%TRX$0.3201▼ 0.92%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.14%ZEC$1,301.72▲ 6.28%HYPE$83.65▼ 2.36%DOGE$0.0772▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 1.68%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.06%LINK$11.51▲ 3.17%LEO$9.35▲ 0.83%ADA$0.1980▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1679▲ 2.49%BCH$283.50▲ 2.82%NEAR$4.05▲ 4.63%UNI$7.72▲ 7.36%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$56.36▲ 2.95%RAIN$0.005961▼ 7.78%CC$0.0985▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.75▲ 2.76%SUI$0.9305▲ 2.98%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.19▲ 1.24%XAUT$4,049.01▲ 3.11%HBAR$0.0727▲ 3.96%QNT$203.62▲ 4.84%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.55%TAO$235.70▲ 3.50%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0518▲ 2.54%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

ASH vs Render

ASH (ASH) and Render (RENDER) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.04 across 31 shared trading days). ASH has been the more volatile of the two, at 159% annualised against RENDER's 95%.

Correlation
0.04
ASHASH

$0.000896

24h
-9.18%
Market cap
—
Volume 24h
$69
Volatility (ann.)
159%
RenderRENDER

$1.6080

24h
+6.01%
Market cap
$853.26M
Volume 24h
$36.31M
Volatility (ann.)
95%
ASH 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% RENDER

Performance

ASHRENDER

  1. 7 days-28.30%-12.29%RENDER
  2. 30 days-10.97%-24.47%ASH
  3. 90 days—+12.44%—
  4. 1 year—-25.49%—

Correlation

0.04over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricASHRENDER
Max drawdown (400d)-45.0%-66.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.070.17
Best 30 days (past year)—+82.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-49.7%

Relative strength over 90 days: RENDER outperformed ASH by 34.1% — measured on the ASH/RENDER ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.