Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is 509.4× the size of B20 (B20) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.36 across 24 shared trading days). B20 has been the more volatile of the two, at 121% annualised against ENS's 82%.
B20ENS
0.36over 24 shared trading days
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
| Metric | B20 | ENS |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -28.3% | -82.4% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.13 | 0.23 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +48.0% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -51.6% |
Relative strength over 90 days: B20 outperformed ENS by 19.6% — measured on the B20/ENS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.