BTC$76,176.01▼ 5.18%ETH$2,239.99▼ 7.37%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.05%BNB$695.86▼ 2.91%XRP$1.20▼ 9.13%USDC$1.00▼ 0.04%SOL$90.15▼ 6.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.05%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.05%ZEC$1,289.52▼ 2.65%HYPE$78.18▼ 5.36%XMR$118.70▼ 3.00%DOGE$0.0724▼ 6.01%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.15▼ 5.80%LEO$9.35▲ 0.03%LINK$10.84▼ 6.10%ADA$0.1858▼ 6.43%XLM$0.1545▼ 7.02%BCH$267.30▼ 6.92%NEAR$3.75▼ 7.00%DAI$1.00▼ 0.05%USDE$1.00▼ 0.09%UNI$7.02▼ 6.53%RAIN$0.005820▼ 6.01%LTC$52.98▼ 5.30%CC$0.0977▼ 3.78%AVAX$8.36▼ 4.89%USD1$0.9995▼ 0.03%SUI$0.8658▼ 6.54%XAUT$4,052.66▼ 1.31%GRAM$1.10▼ 5.10%HBAR$0.0686▼ 5.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.02%QNT$189.60▼ 7.11%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.03%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%TAO$224.40▼ 4.39%CRO$0.0502▼ 3.98%BTC$76,176.01▼ 5.18%ETH$2,239.99▼ 7.37%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.05%BNB$695.86▼ 2.91%XRP$1.20▼ 9.13%USDC$1.00▼ 0.04%SOL$90.15▼ 6.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.05%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.05%ZEC$1,289.52▼ 2.65%HYPE$78.18▼ 5.36%XMR$118.70▼ 3.00%DOGE$0.0724▼ 6.01%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.15▼ 5.80%LEO$9.35▲ 0.03%LINK$10.84▼ 6.10%ADA$0.1858▼ 6.43%XLM$0.1545▼ 7.02%BCH$267.30▼ 6.92%NEAR$3.75▼ 7.00%DAI$1.00▼ 0.05%USDE$1.00▼ 0.09%UNI$7.02▼ 6.53%RAIN$0.005820▼ 6.01%LTC$52.98▼ 5.30%CC$0.0977▼ 3.78%AVAX$8.36▼ 4.89%USD1$0.9995▼ 0.03%SUI$0.8658▼ 6.54%XAUT$4,052.66▼ 1.31%GRAM$1.10▼ 5.10%HBAR$0.0686▼ 5.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.02%QNT$189.60▼ 7.11%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.03%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%TAO$224.40▼ 4.39%CRO$0.0502▼ 3.98%

Baby Shark Meme vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 11119.9× the size of Baby Shark Meme (BABYSHARK) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.01 across 34 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 105% annualised against BABYSHARK's 50%.

Correlation
-0.01
Size ratio
1 : 11119.9
Baby Shark MemeBABYSHARK

$1.498e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$14,977
Volume 24h
$7
Volatility (ann.)
50%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.167100

24h
-2.90%
Market cap
$166.55M
Volume 24h
$33.45M
Volatility (ann.)
105%
BABYSHARK 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BABYSHARKWIF

  1. 7 days-11.72%-2.82%WIF
  2. 30 days-39.22%-34.09%WIF
  3. 90 days—+17.59%—
  4. 1 year—-62.97%—

Correlation

-0.01over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBABYSHARKWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-40.5%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.780.17
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed BABYSHARK by 10.8% — measured on the BABYSHARK/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.