BTC$75,968.00▼ 5.29%ETH$2,248.70▼ 7.20%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$690.41▼ 3.59%XRP$1.23▼ 5.48%USDC$0.9995▼ 0.02%SOL$89.33▼ 6.29%TRX$0.3175▼ 0.68%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.61%ZEC$1,233.72▼ 4.32%HYPE$78.22▼ 7.36%XMR$607.73▼ 3.92%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.29%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$73.19▼ 5.84%LEO$9.32▼ 0.02%LINK$10.75▼ 6.13%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.64%BCH$274.45▼ 2.40%XLM$0.1537▼ 7.71%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.46%USDE$0.9988▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006086▼ 0.83%UNI$6.85▼ 9.89%LTC$52.16▼ 6.93%CC$0.0976▲ 0.11%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.41%USD1$0.9976▼ 0.12%SUI$0.8521▼ 8.39%XAUT$4,082.89▲ 0.96%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.29%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.24%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%QNT$189.89▼ 6.89%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%TAO$219.11▼ 6.40%CRO$0.0492▼ 4.68%BTC$75,968.00▼ 5.29%ETH$2,248.70▼ 7.20%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$690.41▼ 3.59%XRP$1.23▼ 5.48%USDC$0.9995▼ 0.02%SOL$89.33▼ 6.29%TRX$0.3175▼ 0.68%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.61%ZEC$1,233.72▼ 4.32%HYPE$78.22▼ 7.36%XMR$607.73▼ 3.92%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.29%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$73.19▼ 5.84%LEO$9.32▼ 0.02%LINK$10.75▼ 6.13%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.64%BCH$274.45▼ 2.40%XLM$0.1537▼ 7.71%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.46%USDE$0.9988▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006086▼ 0.83%UNI$6.85▼ 9.89%LTC$52.16▼ 6.93%CC$0.0976▲ 0.11%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.41%USD1$0.9976▼ 0.12%SUI$0.8521▼ 8.39%XAUT$4,082.89▲ 0.96%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.29%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.24%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%QNT$189.89▼ 6.89%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%TAO$219.11▼ 6.40%CRO$0.0492▼ 4.68%

Babybonk vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 3996.8× the size of Babybonk (BABYBONK) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.01 across 35 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against BABYBONK's 66%.

Correlation
-0.01
Size ratio
1 : 3996.8
BabybonkBABYBONK

$4.112e-8

24h
+5.17%
Market cap
$40,891
Volume 24h
$36
Volatility (ann.)
66%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.163607

24h
-5.87%
Market cap
$163.43M
Volume 24h
$31.51M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
BABYBONK 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BABYBONKWIF

  1. 7 days-6.72%-7.39%BABYBONK
  2. 30 days-37.84%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.01over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBABYBONKWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-42.4%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.600.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed BABYBONK by 11.6% — measured on the BABYBONK/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.