BAD Coin [OLD] vs Venice Token

BAD Coin [OLD] (BADAI) and Venice Token (VVV) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, VVV is ahead by 8.0 percentage points (BADAI -10.8% against VVV -2.8%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.15 across 21 shared trading days). VVV has been the more volatile of the two, at 170% annualised against BADAI's 33%.

Correlation: -0.15
Ahead over 30 days: VVV

BAD Coin [OLD]BADAI

$2.866e-5

24h: -0.50%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $1
Volatility (ann.): 33%

Venice TokenVVV

$23.2600

24h: +5.12%
Market cap: $1.13B
Volume 24h: $47.04M
Volatility (ann.): 170%

BADAI 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% VVV

Performance

BADAIVVV

7 days-7.21%-12.69%BADAI
30 days-10.80%-2.78%VVV

Correlation

-0.15over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	BADAI	VVV
Max drawdown (400d)	-12.6%	-29.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.30	0.54

Relative strength over 90 days: VVV outperformed BADAI by 9.1% — measured on the BADAI/VVV ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

BAD Coin [OLD] →Venice Token →