BTC$80,446.67▲ 3.59%ETH$2,420.63▲ 5.70%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$713.49▲ 2.16%XRP$1.31▲ 2.66%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.76▲ 3.48%TRX$0.3198▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,314.23▲ 5.39%HYPE$83.16▼ 1.29%DOGE$0.0765▲ 2.69%XMR$118.70▼ 0.44%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.86▲ 4.24%LINK$11.51▲ 4.68%LEO$9.35▲ 0.56%ADA$0.1966▲ 3.75%XLM$0.1668▲ 3.14%BCH$280.90▲ 2.98%NEAR$4.01▲ 3.73%UNI$7.57▲ 4.39%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.64▲ 3.21%RAIN$0.005914▼ 5.42%CC$0.1045▲ 6.42%AVAX$8.73▲ 2.34%SUI$0.9219▲ 3.83%USD1$0.9992▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.16▼ 0.70%XAUT$4,095.98▲ 3.15%HBAR$0.0725▲ 4.69%QNT$205.41▲ 5.72%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.91%TAO$233.30▲ 2.99%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0521▲ 3.59%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%BTC$80,446.67▲ 3.59%ETH$2,420.63▲ 5.70%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$713.49▲ 2.16%XRP$1.31▲ 2.66%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.76▲ 3.48%TRX$0.3198▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,314.23▲ 5.39%HYPE$83.16▼ 1.29%DOGE$0.0765▲ 2.69%XMR$118.70▼ 0.44%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.86▲ 4.24%LINK$11.51▲ 4.68%LEO$9.35▲ 0.56%ADA$0.1966▲ 3.75%XLM$0.1668▲ 3.14%BCH$280.90▲ 2.98%NEAR$4.01▲ 3.73%UNI$7.57▲ 4.39%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.64▲ 3.21%RAIN$0.005914▼ 5.42%CC$0.1045▲ 6.42%AVAX$8.73▲ 2.34%SUI$0.9219▲ 3.83%USD1$0.9992▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.16▼ 0.70%XAUT$4,095.98▲ 3.15%HBAR$0.0725▲ 4.69%QNT$205.41▲ 5.72%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.91%TAO$233.30▲ 2.99%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0521▲ 3.59%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%

Ballsack Dorkal Coin vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 35702.3× the size of Ballsack Dorkal Coin (BDC) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.08 across 68 shared trading days). BDC has been the more volatile of the two, at 517% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.08
Size ratio
1 : 35702.3
Ballsack Dorkal CoinBDC

$4.800e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$4,802
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
517%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.171000

24h
-1.10%
Market cap
$171.45M
Volume 24h
$30.65M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
BDC 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BDCWIF

  1. 7 days+65.74%-7.39%BDC
  2. 30 days-13.14%-32.13%BDC
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.08over 68 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBDCWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-95.7%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.180.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed BDC by 93.2% — measured on the BDC/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.