Batic vs BNB

Batic (BAT) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.27 across 34 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 52% annualised.

Correlation: 0.27

BaticBAT

$5.749e-5

24h: +1.43%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $17
Volatility (ann.): 53%

BNBBNB

$714.2200

24h: +2.79%
Market cap: $94.09B
Volume 24h: $1.14B
Volatility (ann.): 51%

BAT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB

Performance

BATBNB

7 days-14.51%-6.28%BNB
30 days-33.01%-12.23%BNB
90 days—+17.56%—
1 year—-29.73%—

Correlation

0.27over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	BAT	BNB
Max drawdown (400d)	-34.1%	-58.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.63	0.45
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+29.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-34.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed BAT by 26.0% — measured on the BAT/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Batic →BNB →