BTC$77,352.00▼ 1.36%ETH$2,305.28▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$695.62▼ 1.07%XRP$1.27▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$91.59▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3174▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,253.64▼ 4.13%HYPE$79.57▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0733▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.99▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1873▼ 2.87%BCH$280.10▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1589▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.81▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$7.05▼ 5.21%LTC$53.44▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.44▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8731▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,102.09▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0691▼ 4.25%QNT$196.31▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$222.30▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%BTC$77,352.00▼ 1.36%ETH$2,305.28▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$695.62▼ 1.07%XRP$1.27▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$91.59▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3174▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,253.64▼ 4.13%HYPE$79.57▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0733▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.99▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1873▼ 2.87%BCH$280.10▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1589▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.81▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$7.05▼ 5.21%LTC$53.44▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.44▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8731▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,102.09▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0691▼ 4.25%QNT$196.31▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$222.30▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%

Bella Bumper vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 26682.2× the size of Bella Bumper (BUMPER) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.61 across 28 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against BUMPER's 59%.

Correlation
0.61
Size ratio
1 : 26682.2
Bella BumperBUMPER

$1.257e-5

24h
+0.96%
Market cap
$6,278
Volume 24h
$2
Volatility (ann.)
59%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.166500

24h
-4.99%
Market cap
$167.51M
Volume 24h
$28.65M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
BUMPER 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BUMPERWIF

  1. 7 days-3.93%-7.39%BUMPER
  2. 30 days-21.61%-32.13%BUMPER
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.61over 28 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6190d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBUMPERWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-27.8%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.370.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: BUMPER outperformed WIF by 14.7% — measured on the BUMPER/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.