Bettensor vs lium

lium (SN51) is 33.3× the size of Bettensor (SN30) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN51 is ahead by 10.6 percentage points (SN30 +5.5% against SN51 +16.1%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.82 across 23 shared trading days). SN51 has been the more volatile of the two, at 140% annualised against SN30's 95%.

Correlation: 0.82
Size ratio: 1 : 33.3
Ahead over 30 days: SN51

BettensorSN30

$0.756103

24h: +1.75%
Market cap: $4.03M
Volume 24h: $78,103
Volatility (ann.): 95%

liumSN51

$26.5200

24h: +4.67%
Market cap: $134.35M
Volume 24h: $4.41M
Volatility (ann.): 140%

SN30 2.9%Share of the two combined market caps97.1% SN51

Performance

SN30SN51

7 days-0.17%-13.99%SN30
30 days+5.53%+16.13%SN51

Correlation

0.82over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN30	SN51
Max drawdown (400d)	-20.7%	-19.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.06	0.59

Relative strength over 90 days: SN51 outperformed SN30 by 26.2% — measured on the SN30/SN51 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Bettensor →lium →