Bitget Token vs LEO Token

LEO Token (LEO) is 7.0× the size of Bitget Token (BGB) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, LEO is ahead by 10.3 percentage points (BGB -7.3% against LEO +3.1%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.10 across 59 shared trading days). BGB has been the more volatile of the two, at 37% annualised against LEO's 21%.

Correlation: 0.10
Size ratio: 1 : 7.0
Ahead over 30 days: LEO

Bitget TokenBGB

$1.7600

24h: +0.42%
Market cap: $1.23B
Volume 24h: $11.03M
Volatility (ann.): 37%

LEO TokenLEO

$9.3500

24h: +0.36%
Market cap: $8.60B
Volume 24h: $88,547
Volatility (ann.): 21%

BGB 12.5%Share of the two combined market caps87.5% LEO

Performance

BGBLEO

7 days-4.28%-0.32%LEO
30 days-7.25%+3.09%LEO

Correlation

0.10over 59 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1190d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	BGB	LEO
Max drawdown (400d)	-14.2%	-8.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.21	0.01

Relative strength over 90 days: BGB outperformed LEO by 7.7% — measured on the BGB/LEO ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Bitget Token →LEO Token →