ORO vs lium

lium (SN51) is 15.9× the size of ORO (SN15) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN51 is ahead by 29.7 percentage points (SN15 -13.6% against SN51 +16.1%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.80 across 24 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 133% annualised.

Correlation: 0.80
Size ratio: 1 : 15.9
Ahead over 30 days: SN51

OROSN15

$4.0200

24h: +0.35%
Market cap: $8.47M
Volume 24h: $135,615
Volatility (ann.): 125%

liumSN51

$26.6600

24h: +5.51%
Market cap: $135.07M
Volume 24h: $4.50M
Volatility (ann.): 140%

SN15 5.9%Share of the two combined market caps94.1% SN51

Performance

SN15SN51

7 days-4.01%-13.99%SN15
30 days-13.60%+16.13%SN51

Correlation

0.80over 24 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN15	SN51
Max drawdown (400d)	-30.0%	-19.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.11	0.59

Relative strength over 90 days: SN51 outperformed SN15 by 39.1% — measured on the SN15/SN51 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

ORO →lium →