BTC$80,792.01▲ 4.94%ETH$2,432.88▲ 7.47%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$719.83▲ 3.82%XRP$1.31▲ 4.44%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.24▲ 4.65%TRX$0.3199▼ 0.89%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,311.74▲ 9.30%HYPE$84.42▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.27%XMR$118.70▲ 1.13%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$78.09▲ 5.67%LINK$11.48▲ 5.61%LEO$9.35▲ 0.55%ADA$0.1976▲ 5.53%XLM$0.1685▲ 5.65%BCH$283.00▲ 4.40%NEAR$4.05▲ 7.28%UNI$7.66▲ 8.01%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.31▲ 5.55%RAIN$0.005991▼ 7.60%CC$0.1003▲ 3.80%AVAX$8.75▲ 4.28%SUI$0.9300▲ 5.96%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 0.84%XAUT$4,112.16▲ 4.19%HBAR$0.0730▲ 6.63%QNT$202.65▲ 7.06%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.31%TAO$235.80▲ 6.48%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.34%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,792.01▲ 4.94%ETH$2,432.88▲ 7.47%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$719.83▲ 3.82%XRP$1.31▲ 4.44%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.24▲ 4.65%TRX$0.3199▼ 0.89%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,311.74▲ 9.30%HYPE$84.42▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.27%XMR$118.70▲ 1.13%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$78.09▲ 5.67%LINK$11.48▲ 5.61%LEO$9.35▲ 0.55%ADA$0.1976▲ 5.53%XLM$0.1685▲ 5.65%BCH$283.00▲ 4.40%NEAR$4.05▲ 7.28%UNI$7.66▲ 8.01%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.31▲ 5.55%RAIN$0.005991▼ 7.60%CC$0.1003▲ 3.80%AVAX$8.75▲ 4.28%SUI$0.9300▲ 5.96%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 0.84%XAUT$4,112.16▲ 4.19%HBAR$0.0730▲ 6.63%QNT$202.65▲ 7.06%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.31%TAO$235.80▲ 6.48%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.34%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Blastar vs Shiba Inu

Shiba Inu (SHIB) is 827365.8× the size of Blastar (BLASTAR) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.03 across 33 shared trading days). BLASTAR has been the more volatile of the two, at 4901% annualised against SHIB's 69%.

Correlation
-0.03
Size ratio
1 : 827365.8
BlastarBLASTAR

$3.390e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$3,386
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
4901%
Shiba InuSHIB

$4.760e-6

24h
+4.31%
Market cap
$2.80B
Volume 24h
$55.02M
Volatility (ann.)
69%
BLASTAR 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% SHIB

Performance

BLASTARSHIB

  1. 7 days-25.88%-4.83%SHIB
  2. 30 days-4.80%-19.56%BLASTAR
  3. 90 days—+1.07%—
  4. 1 year—-46.55%—

Correlation

-0.03over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBLASTARSHIB
Max drawdown (400d)-96.0%-68.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.000.01
Best 30 days (past year)—+39.1%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-38.4%

Relative strength over 90 days: BLASTAR outperformed SHIB by 23.5% — measured on the BLASTAR/SHIB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.