BLEE vs Bordrless

BLEE (BLEE) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, BLEE is ahead by 11.8 percentage points (BLEE -87.6% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.06 across 20 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against BLEE's 305%.

Correlation: 0.06
Ahead over 30 days: BLEE

BLEEBLEE

$7.912e-6

24h: -6.15%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $119
Volatility (ann.): 305%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

BLEE 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

BLEEBORDR

7 days-68.29%-10.80%BORDR
30 days-87.60%-99.45%BLEE

Correlation

0.06over 20 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	BLEE	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-87.6%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.29	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: BLEE outperformed BORDR by 762.2% — measured on the BLEE/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

BLEE →Bordrless →