BTC$75,592.01▼ 4.98%ETH$2,238.73▼ 6.21%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$687.00▼ 3.19%XRP$1.24▼ 4.57%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$89.31▼ 5.90%TRX$0.3161▼ 1.15%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.39%ZEC$1,219.87▼ 4.50%HYPE$77.85▼ 7.84%XMR$118.70▼ 3.26%DOGE$0.0714▼ 6.15%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$73.58▼ 5.49%LEO$9.35▲ 0.34%LINK$10.61▼ 6.83%ADA$0.1809▼ 6.48%BCH$277.50▲ 0.44%XLM$0.1530▼ 8.01%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.57%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$0.9999▼ 0.04%UNI$6.67▼ 9.56%RAIN$0.005749▼ 1.14%LTC$51.56▼ 6.52%CC$0.0943▼ 5.51%AVAX$8.14▼ 7.22%USD1$0.9990▼ 0.04%SUI$0.8425▼ 8.71%XAUT$4,068.17▲ 1.57%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.86%HBAR$0.0670▼ 6.10%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%QNT$190.49▼ 5.60%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000004▼ 5.27%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%TAO$215.10▼ 7.38%CRO$0.0494▼ 5.29%BTC$75,592.01▼ 4.98%ETH$2,238.73▼ 6.21%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$687.00▼ 3.19%XRP$1.24▼ 4.57%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$89.31▼ 5.90%TRX$0.3161▼ 1.15%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.39%ZEC$1,219.87▼ 4.50%HYPE$77.85▼ 7.84%XMR$118.70▼ 3.26%DOGE$0.0714▼ 6.15%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$73.58▼ 5.49%LEO$9.35▲ 0.34%LINK$10.61▼ 6.83%ADA$0.1809▼ 6.48%BCH$277.50▲ 0.44%XLM$0.1530▼ 8.01%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.57%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$0.9999▼ 0.04%UNI$6.67▼ 9.56%RAIN$0.005749▼ 1.14%LTC$51.56▼ 6.52%CC$0.0943▼ 5.51%AVAX$8.14▼ 7.22%USD1$0.9990▼ 0.04%SUI$0.8425▼ 8.71%XAUT$4,068.17▲ 1.57%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.86%HBAR$0.0670▼ 6.10%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%QNT$190.49▼ 5.60%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000004▼ 5.27%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%TAO$215.10▼ 7.38%CRO$0.0494▼ 5.29%

BloodLoop vs Decentraland

Decentraland (MANA) is 11671.4× the size of BloodLoop ($BLS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.08 across 35 shared trading days). MANA has been the more volatile of the two, at 77% annualised against $BLS's 21%.

Correlation
0.08
Size ratio
1 : 11671.4
BloodLoop$BLS

$5.483e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$11,835
Volume 24h
$2
Volatility (ann.)
21%
DecentralandMANA

$0.069100

24h
-6.35%
Market cap
$138.13M
Volume 24h
$9.84M
Volatility (ann.)
77%
$BLS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% MANA

Performance

$BLSMANA

  1. 7 days-0.40%-5.29%$BLS
  2. 30 days-4.87%-28.52%$BLS
  3. 90 days—+13.08%—
  4. 1 year—-62.51%—

Correlation

0.08over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric$BLSMANA
Max drawdown (400d)-6.4%-82.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.160.19
Best 30 days (past year)—+43.6%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-42.8%

Relative strength over 90 days: $BLS outperformed MANA by 14.3% — measured on the $BLS/MANA ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.