BlueClaw vs ARGUE.FUN

ARGUE.FUN ($ARGUE) is 10.5× the size of BlueClaw (BCLAW) by market capitalisation. Over the past 90 days, $ARGUE is ahead by 63.8 percentage points (BCLAW -41.3% against $ARGUE +22.5%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.64 across 78 shared trading days). BCLAW has been the more volatile of the two, at 221% annualised against $ARGUE's 112%.

Correlation: 0.64
Size ratio: 1 : 10.5
Ahead over 90 days: $ARGUE

BlueClawBCLAW

$2.690e-7

24h: +0.18%
Market cap: $26,895
Volume 24h: $1
Volatility (ann.): 221%

ARGUE.FUN$ARGUE

$3.710e-6

24h: -6.91%
Market cap: $281,648
Volume 24h: $297
Volatility (ann.): 112%

BCLAW 8.7%Share of the two combined market caps91.3% $ARGUE

Performance

BCLAW$ARGUE

7 days-4.13%-0.64%$ARGUE
30 days-4.86%-13.01%BCLAW
90 days-41.26%+22.53%$ARGUE

Correlation

0.64over 78 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.9490d: 0.641y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	BCLAW	$ARGUE
Max drawdown (400d)	-77.7%	-84.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.20	0.30

Relative strength over 90 days: BCLAW outperformed $ARGUE by 90.8% — measured on the BCLAW/$ARGUE ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

BlueClaw →ARGUE.FUN →