BTC$76,046.00▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.84▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.27▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.43▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,234.58▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.31▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1831▼ 6.72%BCH$274.50▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1539▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.19▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9987▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8525▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,087.79▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.00▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,046.00▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.84▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.27▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.43▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,234.58▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.31▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1831▼ 6.72%BCH$274.50▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1539▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.19▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9987▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8525▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,087.79▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.00▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

Boblles vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 9688.1× the size of Boblles (BOBLS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.19 across 31 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against BOBLS's 33%.

Correlation
0.19
Size ratio
1 : 9688.1
BobllesBOBLS

$1.687e-5

24h
+4.41%
Market cap
$16,867
Volume 24h
$1
Volatility (ann.)
33%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.163700

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
BOBLS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BOBLSWIF

  1. 7 days-5.63%-7.39%BOBLS
  2. 30 days-22.58%-32.13%BOBLS
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.19over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBOBLSWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-24.3%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.680.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: BOBLS outperformed WIF by 15.3% — measured on the BOBLS/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.