BTC$76,999.25▼ 1.36%ETH$2,283.79▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$692.91▼ 1.07%XRP$1.26▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$90.87▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,231.36▼ 4.13%HYPE$78.82▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0728▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.89▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1861▼ 2.87%BCH$281.20▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1570▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.77▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$6.98▼ 5.21%LTC$53.07▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.37▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8648▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,099.47▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0685▼ 4.25%QNT$194.06▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$220.50▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%BTC$76,999.25▼ 1.36%ETH$2,283.79▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$692.91▼ 1.07%XRP$1.26▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$90.87▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,231.36▼ 4.13%HYPE$78.82▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0728▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.89▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1861▼ 2.87%BCH$281.20▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1570▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.77▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$6.98▼ 5.21%LTC$53.07▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.37▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8648▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,099.47▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0685▼ 4.25%QNT$194.06▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$220.50▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%

Forj vs Decentraland

Decentraland (MANA) is 1346.4× the size of Forj (BONDLY) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.12 across 34 shared trading days). BONDLY has been the more volatile of the two, at 556% annualised against MANA's 77%.

Correlation
-0.12
Size ratio
1 : 1346.4
ForjBONDLY

$0.000107

24h
—
Market cap
$105,503
Volume 24h
$133
Volatility (ann.)
556%
DecentralandMANA

$0.071100

24h
-2.60%
Market cap
$142.05M
Volume 24h
$9.70M
Volatility (ann.)
77%
BONDLY 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% MANA

Performance

BONDLYMANA

  1. 7 days+2.74%-5.29%BONDLY
  2. 30 days-8.02%-28.52%BONDLY
  3. 90 days—+13.08%—
  4. 1 year—-62.51%—

Correlation

-0.12over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBONDLYMANA
Max drawdown (400d)-63.2%-82.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.010.19
Best 30 days (past year)—+43.6%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-42.8%

Relative strength over 90 days: BONDLY outperformed MANA by 10.0% — measured on the BONDLY/MANA ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.