BonkEarn vs catwifhat

catwifhat ($CWIF) is 15.0× the size of BonkEarn (BERN) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, BERN is ahead by 40.4 percentage points (BERN -9.1% against $CWIF -49.5%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.35 across 36 shared trading days). BERN has been the more volatile of the two, at 146% annualised against $CWIF's 126%.

Correlation: 0.35
Size ratio: 1 : 15.0
Ahead over 30 days: BERN

BonkEarnBERN

$0.001117

24h: -1.05%
Market cap: $1.05M
Volume 24h: $804
Volatility (ann.): 146%

catwifhat$CWIF

$1.578e-8

24h: +0.21%
Market cap: $15.78M
Volume 24h: $653
Volatility (ann.): 126%

BERN 6.3%Share of the two combined market caps93.7% $CWIF

Performance

BERN$CWIF

7 days-10.00%-41.00%BERN
30 days-9.11%-49.47%BERN

Correlation

0.35over 36 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	BERN	$CWIF
Max drawdown (400d)	-36.4%	-49.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.09	-0.39

Relative strength over 90 days: BERN outperformed $CWIF by 71.0% — measured on the BERN/$CWIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

BonkEarn →catwifhat →