BTC$75,892.02▼ 5.84%ETH$2,234.14▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$688.45▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.17▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3181▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,276.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$76.85▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0710▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.66▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1806▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1526▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.65▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.80▼ 11.13%LTC$51.56▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.15▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8391▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,073.60▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0673▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.41▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%BTC$75,892.02▼ 5.84%ETH$2,234.14▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$688.45▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.17▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3181▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,276.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$76.85▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0710▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.66▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1806▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1526▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.65▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.80▼ 11.13%LTC$51.56▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.15▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8391▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,073.60▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0673▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.41▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%

bullwifhat vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 12389.4× the size of bullwifhat (BULLWIF) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.13 across 27 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against BULLWIF's 53%.

Correlation
0.13
Size ratio
1 : 12389.4
bullwifhatBULLWIF

$1.303e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$12,967
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
53%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.161100

24h
-6.07%
Market cap
$160.66M
Volume 24h
$30.99M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
BULLWIF 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BULLWIFWIF

  1. 7 days-2.92%-7.39%BULLWIF
  2. 30 days-20.26%-32.13%BULLWIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.13over 27 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBULLWIFWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-25.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.380.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: BULLWIF outperformed WIF by 16.6% — measured on the BULLWIF/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.