BurningJup vs Bordrless

BurningJup (BURN) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, BURN is ahead by 27.0 percentage points (BURN -72.5% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.06 across 31 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against BURN's 176%.

Correlation: -0.06
Ahead over 30 days: BURN

BurningJupBURN

$9.259e-6

24h: +8.77%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $30,516
Volatility (ann.): 176%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

BURN 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

BURNBORDR

7 days-11.09%-10.80%BORDR
30 days-72.50%-99.45%BURN

Correlation

-0.06over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	BURN	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-85.3%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.47	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: BURN outperformed BORDR by 761.6% — measured on the BURN/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

BurningJup →Bordrless →