Caila vs Shiba Inu

Caila (CA) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.30 across 30 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 65% annualised.

Correlation: 0.30

CailaCA

$1.819e-5

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 61%

Shiba InuSHIB

$4.840e-6

24h: +4.07%
Market cap: $2.85B
Volume 24h: $52.73M
Volatility (ann.): 69%

CA 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% SHIB

Performance

CASHIB

7 days+0.27%-5.70%CA
30 days-11.38%-21.66%CA
90 days—-5.89%—
1 year—-49.62%—

Correlation

0.30over 30 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CA	SHIB
Max drawdown (400d)	-17.6%	-68.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.19	-0.08
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+39.1%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-38.4%

Relative strength over 90 days: CA outperformed SHIB by 9.9% — measured on the CA/SHIB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Caila →Shiba Inu →