BTC$78,404.52▲ 2.43%ETH$2,320.30▲ 2.94%USDT$0.9989▲ 0.03%BNB$702.45▲ 1.35%XRP$1.28▲ 2.30%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.09▲ 1.53%TRX$0.3223▲ 0.21%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,289.51▲ 14.04%HYPE$86.71▲ 3.66%XMR$118.70▲ 3.41%DOGE$0.0751▲ 1.96%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.46▲ 2.48%LINK$11.14▲ 0.65%LEO$9.31▲ 0.47%ADA$0.1912▲ 2.92%XLM$0.1634▲ 1.76%BCH$275.10▲ 0.08%NEAR$4.05▲ 7.13%UNI$7.44▲ 5.50%DAI$1.0000▲ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.09%RAIN$0.006227▼ 1.52%LTC$54.54▲ 1.62%CC$0.0995▲ 6.03%AVAX$8.69▲ 3.71%SUI$0.9118▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9997▲ 0.07%GRAM$1.18▲ 1.81%XAUT$4,033.55▲ 3.40%HBAR$0.0707▲ 2.37%QNT$194.92▼ 0.43%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.08%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.01%TAO$229.60▲ 4.25%CRO$0.0513▲ 2.43%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%BTC$78,404.52▲ 2.43%ETH$2,320.30▲ 2.94%USDT$0.9989▲ 0.03%BNB$702.45▲ 1.35%XRP$1.28▲ 2.30%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.09▲ 1.53%TRX$0.3223▲ 0.21%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,289.51▲ 14.04%HYPE$86.71▲ 3.66%XMR$118.70▲ 3.41%DOGE$0.0751▲ 1.96%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.46▲ 2.48%LINK$11.14▲ 0.65%LEO$9.31▲ 0.47%ADA$0.1912▲ 2.92%XLM$0.1634▲ 1.76%BCH$275.10▲ 0.08%NEAR$4.05▲ 7.13%UNI$7.44▲ 5.50%DAI$1.0000▲ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.09%RAIN$0.006227▼ 1.52%LTC$54.54▲ 1.62%CC$0.0995▲ 6.03%AVAX$8.69▲ 3.71%SUI$0.9118▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9997▲ 0.07%GRAM$1.18▲ 1.81%XAUT$4,033.55▲ 3.40%HBAR$0.0707▲ 2.37%QNT$194.92▼ 0.43%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.08%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.01%TAO$229.60▲ 4.25%CRO$0.0513▲ 2.43%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%

CANA Holdings California Carbon Credits vs Stellar

Stellar (XLM) is 9150.4× the size of CANA Holdings California Carbon Credits (CANA) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.08 across 33 shared trading days). CANA has been the more volatile of the two, at 127% annualised against XLM's 78%.

Correlation
0.08
Size ratio
1 : 9150.4
CANA Holdings California Carbon CreditsCANA

$20.5300

24h
—
Market cap
$633,074
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
127%
StellarXLM

$0.163400

24h
+1.76%
Market cap
$5.79B
Volume 24h
$133.98M
Volatility (ann.)
78%
CANA 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% XLM

Performance

CANAXLM

  1. 7 days-22.09%-4.81%XLM
  2. 30 days+7.46%-27.58%CANA
  3. 90 days—-1.64%—
  4. 1 year—-41.66%—

Correlation

0.08over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricCANAXLM
Max drawdown (400d)-27.0%-64.9%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.02-0.02
Best 30 days (past year)—+63.3%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-39.7%

Relative strength over 90 days: CANA outperformed XLM by 6.2% — measured on the CANA/XLM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.