CAT O'LANTERN vs Bordrless

CAT O'LANTERN (CATO) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, CATO is ahead by 103.3 percentage points (CATO +3.5% against BORDR -99.8%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.28 across 22 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 907% annualised against CATO's 428%.

Correlation: -0.28
Ahead over 30 days: CATO

CAT O'LANTERNCATO

$4.433e-5

24h: -4.07%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $332
Volatility (ann.): 428%

BordrlessBORDR

$1.323e-5

24h: -10.45%
Market cap: $13,231
Volume 24h: $950,857
Volatility (ann.): 907%

CATO 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

CATOBORDR

7 days+73.22%-35.56%CATO
30 days+3.53%-99.81%CATO

Correlation

-0.28over 22 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CATO	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-68.0%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.01	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: CATO outperformed BORDR by 4436.6% — measured on the CATO/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

CAT O'LANTERN →Bordrless →