CCQKL vs XRP

CCQKL (CC) and XRP (XRP) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.04 across 21 shared trading days). XRP has been the more volatile of the two, at 65% annualised against CC's 2%.

Correlation: 0.04

CCQKLCC

$0.001181

24h: -0.01%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $32
Volatility (ann.): 2%

XRPXRP

$1.3118

24h: +2.24%
Market cap: $82.81B
Volume 24h: $2.62B
Volatility (ann.): 65%

CC 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% XRP

Performance

CCXRP

7 days-0.25%-4.10%CC
30 days—-16.04%—
90 days—+20.18%—
1 year—-44.72%—

Correlation

0.04over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CC	XRP
Max drawdown (400d)	-0.8%	-67.3%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.44	0.29
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+41.9%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-47.3%

Relative strength over 90 days: CC outperformed XRP by 17.8% — measured on the CC/XRP ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

CCQKL →XRP →