Cellframe vs Mantle

Mantle (MNT) is 727.9× the size of Cellframe (CELL) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, CELL is ahead by 155.3 percentage points (CELL +138.0% against MNT -17.3%). Their daily returns move closely in opposite directions (correlation -0.64 across 28 shared trading days). CELL has been the more volatile of the two, at 449% annualised against MNT's 100%.

Correlation: -0.64
Size ratio: 1 : 727.9
Ahead over 30 days: CELL

CellframeCELL

$0.056113

24h: -8.59%
Market cap: $2.09M
Volume 24h: $26,469
Volatility (ann.): 449%

MantleMNT

$0.459752

24h: -2.22%
Market cap: $1.52B
Volume 24h: $37.79M
Volatility (ann.): 100%

CELL 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% MNT

Performance

CELLMNT

7 days-1.58%-8.39%CELL
30 days+138.04%-17.29%CELL

Correlation

-0.64over 28 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.6490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CELL	MNT
Max drawdown (400d)	-9.9%	-31.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.38	0.06

Relative strength over 90 days: CELL outperformed MNT by 221.9% — measured on the CELL/MNT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Cellframe →Mantle →