Centrifuge [OLD] vs Collector Crypt

Centrifuge [OLD] (CFG) and Collector Crypt (CARDS) compared side by side. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.59 across 35 shared trading days). CARDS has been the more volatile of the two, at 226% annualised against CFG's 144%.

Correlation: 0.59

Centrifuge [OLD]CFG

$0.092360

24h: +1.26%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $313,639
Volatility (ann.): 144%

Collector CryptCARDS

$0.262584

24h: -5.48%
Market cap: $233.94M
Volume 24h: $10.13M
Volatility (ann.): 226%

CFG 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% CARDS

Performance

CFGCARDS

7 days+12.24%-17.07%CFG
30 days+26.03%+91.22%CARDS
90 days-20.41%——
1 year-52.55%——

Correlation

0.59over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CFG	CARDS
Max drawdown (400d)	-78.7%	-44.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.22	0.21

Relative strength over 90 days: CARDS outperformed CFG by 25.0% — measured on the CFG/CARDS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Centrifuge [OLD] →Collector Crypt →